Recontextualization of cundhuk jungkat in Javanese women’s attire: From signifier of virginity to aesthetic component of dance costume

Authors

  • Hartanto Department of Dance, Indonesia Institute of the Arts Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Sriyadi Department of Dance, Indonesia Institute of the Arts Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5581-3090
  • Indri Hapsari Performing Arts Faculty Laboratory Institution, Indonesia Institute of the Arts Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Syahrial Department of Dance, Indonesia Institute of the Arts Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Cundhuk jungkat, Meaning reduction, Value transformation, Costume design, Javanese dance

Abstract

Cundhuk jungkat is an element of Surakarta court attire that is symbolically associated with marital status and aristocratic identity. Within aristocratic dress practices, its use was normatively associated with unmarried noblewomen. The ornament also constitutes an important component of female dance costumes in the Surakarta style. This study examines the recontextualization of the meaning of cundhuk jungkat and the cultural factors underlying this shift. The study focuses specifically on Surakarta-style dance, particularly bedhaya and srimpi, within the artistic traditions of the Surakarta court. It employs a qualitative ethnocoreological approach, drawing primarily on documentary sources, including written records, scholarly literature, and photographic documentation, complemented by the researcher’s practical experience as a dance practitioner to provide contextual insight into costume practices. The findings show that cundhuk jungkat has shifted from a normative-regulative attribute within aristocratic dress to an aesthetic, artistic, and performative element of dance costume. Its function as a marker of social and personal status, particularly unmarried status, is no longer primary, while its visual and artistic functions have become increasingly prominent. Nevertheless, its gendered dimension remains evident through its continued use as part of female dancers’ costumes. This shift does not indicate the disappearance of its symbolic meaning, but rather a reconfiguration of the hierarchy of its functions through a process of recontextualization. The findings demonstrate how a traditional attribute embedded in the normative and hierarchical order of the court is negotiated and reinterpreted within changing social and performative contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adamo, G. E. (2011). Nigerian dress as a symbolic language. Semiotica, 2011(184), 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.019

Amal, Y. khoirul, Wibowo, P. A. W., & Pitana, T. S. (2023). “Dadi Lemek Dadi Gandhek” in Javanese Cultural Perspective. IJMMU, 10(11), 298–304. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i11.5296

Arvanitidou, Z., & Gasouka, M. (2013). Construction of Gender through Fashion and Dressing. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(11), 111–115. doi: https://doi.org/10.5901/MJSS.2013.V4N11P111

Braizaz, M. (2019). Femininity and Fashion: How Women Experience Gender Role Through their Dressing Practices. Cadernos de Arte e Antropologia, 8(1), 59–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/cadernosaa.2001

Brakel-Papenhuyzen, C. (1988). The Sacred Bedhaya Dance of the Kraton of Surakarta and Yogyakarta. Van Onderen.

Chandler, C. R. (1979). Traditionalism in a Modern Setting: A Comparison of Anglo- and Mexican-American Value Orientations. Human Organization, 38(2), 153–159. doi: https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.38.2.m42055516600n321

Eicher, J. B., & Roach-Higgins, M. E. (1992). Definition and Classification of Dress: Implications for Analysis of Gender Roles. In Dress and Gender: Making and Meaning. Berg Publishers, Inc.

Faccia, A. (2019). Discursos Sobre El Cuerpo, Vestimenta Y Desigualdad De Género. Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño Y Comunicación, 76, 37–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi76.1054

Fahrinisa, F. & Sriyadi. (2025). Karakteristik Tari Bedhayan Cheng Ho Karya Sangghita Anjali: Studi Tentang Inovasi Bersumber Tari Tradisi. Tamumatra, 8(1), 63–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.29408/tmmt.v8i1.29882

Hermono, U. (2014). Gusti Noeroel: Streven Naar Geluk (Mengejar Kebahagiaan). Kompas.

Höpflinger, A.-K. (2014). Clothing as a Meaningful Marker of Space: A Comparative Approach to Embodied Religion from a Cultural Studies Perspective. In M. K. George & D. Pezzoli-Olgiati (Eds.), Religious Representation in Place: Exploring Meaningful Spaces at the Intersection of the Humanities and Sciences (pp. 177–192). Palgrave Macmillan US.

Jestratijević, I. (2015). Fashion and the Semiotics of Gender. Etnoantropološki Problemi Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology, 10(4), 839–856. doi: https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v10i4.3

Maula, N. A., & Jabbar, H. A. (2025). Gender Relations in Javanese Culture. Takafu: Journal of Tafsir and Gender Perspective, 2(1), 29–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.29313/takafu.v2i1.6835

Myrlinda, F. R. (2020). SITI: Javanese’s Beliefs as the Representation of Gender Roles and Inequalities towards Women’s Position. Jentera: Jurnal Kajian Sastra, 9(2), 187–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.26499/jentera.v9i2.1358

Ngatinah. (2008). Karakter Busana Kebesaran Raja Surakarta dan Yogyakarta Hadiningrat Periode 1755-2005. Journal of Visual Art and Design, 2(2), 173–196. doi: https://doi.org/10.5614/itbj.vad.2008.2.2.5

Pramutomo, R. M. & Sriyadi. (2025). Transformation Bedhaya Dance in Java Society: Rituals, Ceremonials, Entertainment. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 35(1), 67–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v35i1.4820

Prihatini, N. S., Dewi, N. K., Sunarno, Wahyudiarto, D., & Bantolo, W. (2007). Ilmu Tari: Joged Tradisi Gaya Kasunanan Surakarta. ISI Press.

Smirnova, E. Al. (2025). Transformation of the Value Orientations of Modern Society. Society and Security Insights, 8(3), 207–230. doi: https://doi.org/10.14258/SSI(2025)3-12

Sriyadi, Hartanto, Syahrial, & Hapsari, I. (2025). Gender Symbolism in Sampur and Samparan of Surakarta-Style Javanese Dance Costume Design. Gondang: Jurnal Seni Dan Budaya, 9(1), 71–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.24114/gondang.v9i1.64720

Sriyadi, Imama, Y. N., & Adiwendro, F. (2024). Bedhaya Anglirmendhung, a Sacred Dance at Mangkunegaran: The Study of Aesthetic Authority and Characteristics. Arts and Design Studies, 111, 33–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.7176/ADS/111-03

Stillman, Y. K., & Micklewright, N. (1992). Costume in the Middle East. Middle East Studies Association Bulletin, 26(1), 13–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026318400025025

Sulistyono, IF. B., & Panuwun, D. (2018). Transformation of Forms and Functions of Javanese Traditional House in Kauman Surakarta. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Creative Media, Design and Technology (REKA 2018), 347–350. Atlantis Press.

Sutantio, M. (2020). Fashion sebagai Perlawanan dan Media Komunikasi. Jurnal Rupa, 5(2), 74–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.25124/rupa.v5i2.2384

Tirtaamidjaja, N. (1967). A Beḍaja Ketawang Dance Performance at the Court of Surakarta. Indonesia, 3, 31–61.

Widyastuti, S. H. (2015). Latar Sosial dan Politik Penggunaan Busana Adat dan Tatakrama di Surakarta dalam Serat Tatakrama Kedhaton. Jurnal Ikadbudi, 4(10), 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/ikadbudi.v4i10.12017

Zulkifli, Amrizal, Zein, N., & Ahmad, R. R. M. R. (2024). Customary Shift Based on Islamic Teachings, Ban on Music in Naumbai Village, Kampar, Riau; Ethnographic Study. Jurnal Pendidikan Multikultural Indonesia, 7(2), 208–225. doi: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpmu.v7i2.84240

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Hartanto, Sriyadi, Hapsari, I., & Syahrial. (2026). Recontextualization of cundhuk jungkat in Javanese women’s attire: From signifier of virginity to aesthetic component of dance costume. Humanities & Language: International Journal of Linguistics, Humanities, and Education, 3(3), 245-261. https://amedialiterasi.com/index.php/humaniola/article/view/143

Similar Articles

21-30 of 33

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.