Illocutionary speech acts in the Oscar-winning short film The Neighbors' Window: A pragmatic analysis
Keywords:
Illocutionary Speech Acts, The Neighbors' Window, Pragmatic Analysis, Searle's Taxonomy,, Film DialogueAbstract
This research presents a pragmatic analysis of illocutionary speech acts in the dialogue of The Neighbors' Window (2019), an Academy Award-winning short film directed by Marshall Curry. Drawing on Searle's (1976) taxonomy, this study identifies and classifies 28 illocutionary acts across five categories: expressives (28.6%), directives (25.0%), assertives (25.0%), commissives (17.9%), and declarations (3.6%). Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the film's transcript was systematically analyzed to examine how illocutionary acts function in conveying character intentions, emotional states, and relational dynamics. Expressives are the most frequent, reflecting the film's emotional intensity, while declarations are rare. The distribution correlates with the film's narrative structure, with expressives dominating the conflict phase and assertives and expressives characterizing the emotional climax. The analysis demonstrates that illocutionary acts are integral to the film's storytelling, character development, and emotional communication. The findings contribute to the growing body of pragmatic research on cinematic discourse and suggest pedagogical applications for teaching pragmatics through film dialogue.
Downloads
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Clarendon Press
Blackwell, S. E. (2010). Evaluation as a pragmatic act in Spanish film narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 2945–2963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.018
Bubel, C. M. (2008). Film audiences as overhearers. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.001
Norrick, N. R. (2015). Narrative illocutionary acts: Direct and indirect. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.00
Bramantio, F. G. M., & Gunawan, H. (2025). Pragmatic analysis of illocutionary act used in quarrelling scene of "Ted 2" movie. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v9i2.18742
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Curry, M. (Director). (2019). The Neighbors' Window [Short film]. Marshall Curry Productions. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8163822/
Dwiva, A. (2023). Adjacency pairs in The Neighbors' Window short movie [Undergraduate thesis, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung]. Digilib UIN Sunan Gunung Djati. https://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/91994/
Fahroji. (2025). Illucutionary Acts Analysis of the Main Character in the Oppenhaimer Movie:Interwine: Jurnal of English Language, Literary, and Cultural Studies 1(3). GARUDA record
Janney, R. W. (2012). Pragmatics and cinematic discourse. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 8(1), 85–113. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2012-0006
Faisal, W. M. (2026). Pragmatic failure in Arabic-English translation: Evidence from Iraqi EFL learners. Humanities & Language: International Journal of Linguistics, Humanities, and Education, 3(2), 118–133. https://amedialiterasi.com/index.php/humaniola/article/view/136
Khoif, M. A., & Rokhman, F. (2025). Representation of expressive speech acts in the WebSeries 17 Selamanya: A case study in pragmatic analysis. Humanities & Language: International Journal of Linguistics, Humanities, and Education, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.32734/gcmnfg48
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Liu, P., & Liu, H. (2021). Salience adjusting: Metapragmatic expressions in complaint responses. Journal of Pragmatics, 176, 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.003
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313
Mauchand, M., & Pell, M. D. (2021). Emotivity in the voice: Prosodic, lexical, and cultural appraisal of complaining speech. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 619222. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.619222
Mustafidiah. (2024). An analysis of adjacency pairs in the conversation on Oscar winning short film (live action) 2020 “The Neighbors' Window” [Undergraduate thesis, UIN Raden Intan Lampung]. Repository Raden Intan. https://repository.radenintan.ac.id/35854/
Nisa, B., & Naomisa, R. (2025). Unveiling movie dialogue through speech acts: A pragmatic analysis of Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom. J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies, 6(1), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jes.2025.6.1.15834
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438
Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837
Selting, M. (2012). Complaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affect displays. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(4), 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.005
Sutrisno, B., & Rahim, D. C. J. (2025). Language in action: Interpreting illocutionary speech acts in Tick, Tick…Boom! International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v9i1.10167
Taulia, Gapur, A., & Pujiono, M. (2024). Communicating Hospitality: A Speech Act Analysis of Tourism Services at Lake Toba. International Journal of Culture and Art Studies, 8(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.32734/ijcas.v8i2.22419
Taulia, Mhd. Pujiono, & Abdul Gapur. (2025). Lakuan Bahasa dalam Perkhidmatan Pelancongan di Tasik Toba. Jurnal Bahasa, 25(2), 371. https://doi.org/10.37052/jb25(2)no7
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rostina, Ushwa Dwi Masrurah Arifin Bando, Nur Fadilah Ayu Sandira, Indri Iswardhani, Dien Afni Ariyati (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors agree to publish their work under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
- Authors retain copyright to their work and may reuse or distribute it.
- HUMANIOLA reserves the right to request revisions and make final publication decisions.
- Authors are responsible for ensuring that their work does not infringe upon third-party copyrights.
- Archiving in digital repositories may be done for long-term access and preservation.




